Was sind Chinas Flugzeugträger eigentlich wert?



Die sechs asiatischen Players im Kampf um die berüchtigte nine dotted line, die rote Neun-Striche-Linie, die Chinas Anspruch auf as Südchinesische Meer zeigt: Rotchina, Indonesien, Brunei, Malaysia, die Philippinen und Vietnam.

Rotchina sucht Vietnam, die Philippen, Malaysia, Singapur, Indonsien, Brunei, ja selbst die USA einzuschüchtern. Drohmittel sind Chinas Raketen wie die “Träger-Killer” DongFeng DF41 und vor allem der oder die Flugzeugträger. Der Träger ist wohl eher zutreffend. Einigermassen operationell ist nur der erste: die Lianonig. Das militärfreundliche amerikanische Magazin “The National Interest” wirft die Frage auf: “Wie gefährlich sind eigentlich Chinas Flugzeugträger?” Es folgt die Antwort im Originaltext:

Here’s What You Need To Remember

By Caleb Larson

“China definitely still has a long way to go. Two aircraft carriers that are based on 1980s technology are in no way close to as capable as modern nuclear-powered carriers. Still, China has progressed in leaps and bounds.

China currently has two aircraft carriers, with a third in early construction, and a fourth planned for sometime in the mid 2020 or 2030s. Their first carrier, the Liaoning was commissioned by the PLAN in 2012, though it was first laid down in the early 1990s. It was an unfinished Ukrainian carrier, inherited from the Soviet Union, which was then sold to China.

Die Liaoning, der Carrier Type 002.

 China’s second carrier, the Type 002, was essentially a copy of the Liaoning, though it did feature some incremental improvements including upgraded radar, and increased fighter capacity. Like the Liaoning, it features a large ski jump above the bow that helps launch jet fighters into the air. 

The Type 003 will be larger than both the Type 002 and the Liaoning, and have a steam catapult launch assist system similar to what the United States uses on aircraft carriers—and thus will likely dispense with the ski-jump bow launch assist platform. 

In an interview with The National Interest, an expert on China’s naval abilities said that “the third carrier will be an attempt at…steam catapults and hydraulic arresting gear that will allow China to launch aircraft with heavier bomb loads and go longer ranges.” 

Another expert concurred, saying that “It the Type 003 will also likely be larger than the Type 001 or the Liaoning, enabling it to carry more aircraft. The PLAN also wants to expand the range of their carrier-based aircraft, and more importantly, they need to be able to launch early warning and electronic warfare aircraft as well as larger fighter-bombers that can carry more weapons. They need catapults and arresting gear to deploy these kinds of aircraft.” So more fighters, and better armed.

The Type 004 would be the most advanced of China’s aircraft carriers once completed and would be considered a third-generation aircraft carrier. In addition to electro-magnetic launch capabilities, the Type 004 would be the first aircraft carrier in China’s navy that would use nuclear propulsion. It would also have enough power output to power railgun or laser weapons that are currently in development and testing. 

China reportedly spent over $3 billion researching a unique molten salt nuclear reactor that could be used to propel the Type 004. It purportedly generates more heat, which can be converted to electricity, and creates only a fraction of the radiation as uranium-powered reactors. 

The first hull is expected in the late 2020s or possibly later, though details about the People’s Liberation Army Navy are notoriously difficult to come by.

Tomorrow’s Aircraft Carriers…Tomorrow?

China definitely still has a long way to go. Two aircraft carriers that are based on 1980s technology are in no way close to as capable as modern nuclear-powered carriers. Still, China has progressed in leaps and bounds. If the Type 003 and Type 004 can put their money where their mouth is—if they are as capable as projected by western analysts and as claimed by the Chinese—then they would indeed be a force to be reckoned with.”

Caleb Larson is a Defense Writer with The National Interest. He holds a Master of Public Policy and covers U.S. and Russian security, European defense issues, and German politics and culture.  

Etwas unübersichtlich, die Karte! Aber sie zeigt die Ansprüche im Chinesischen Meer. Plus die wichtigsten Zankapfel: Spratly Islands, Paracel Islands, Scarborough Reef (or Shoal).